sword and 2hand

[ngelucc]

I can't understand why a two-handed sword does more or less damage than a sword. Adding two-handed resistance makes little sense and has led almost everyone to use only the sword... this makes absolutely no sense.
If the goal was to enhance the sura, it would have been enough to give a buff to the weaker races or a debuff to the warrior. What you've done has led to only using swords, devaluing two-handed weapons.
I'm writing this post to see if I'm the one who doesn't understand the point, or if this actually makes little sense and the situation should be resolved.

 

[IDemonI]

The 2 hand nerf is only <lv90. And i dont think it bothers anyone anymore since its mostly stones that have higher 2hand res

 

[ngelucc]

The 2 hand nerf is only <lv90. And i dont think it bothers anyone anymore since its mostly stones that have higher 2hand res

can you be more specific about "The 2 hand nerf is only <lv90"? please

 

[IDemonI]

can you be more specific about "The 2 hand nerf is only <lv90"? please

Its only nerfed for low level, over lv 90, the 2 hand is not nerfed anymore, bosses have less 2hand res than sword, and stones have equal resistances. Other than that, the only place it should bother you a bit is helia and red forest, since those are medium level maps with good players, every little damage counts, but for everything else nah dont bother

 

[ngelucc]

Its only nerfed for low level, over lv 90, the 2 hand is not nerfed anymore, bosses have less 2hand res than sword, and stones have equal resistances. Other than that, the only place it should bother you a bit is helia and red forest, since those are medium level maps with good players, every little damage counts, but for everything else nah dont bother

so in beta map grudge is better than poison? and solar is better than rune?

 

[CXG14]

so in beta map grudge is better than poison? and solar is better than rune?

Yes. But the dmg between a solar and rune is 200-300 dmg so if youre not min maxing you can buy a rune and use it for stones and dungeons.

 

[HungryPen]

My two cents:

- Warrior LVL 35 Aura M9 full str
- FMS +9 39 makes less damage than RIB +9 36 avg to lvl 35 stones.

Why?

 

[Jimin]

My two cents:

- Warrior LVL 35 Aura M9 full str
- FMS +9 39 makes less damage than RIB +9 36 avg to lvl 35 stones.

Why?

Math?

 

[CXG14]

My two cents:

- Warrior LVL 35 Aura M9 full str
- FMS +9 39 makes less damage than RIB +9 36 avg to lvl 35 stones.

Why?

Because they undo the nerf for some lower lvl metins and kept it only for higher ones, if you have the bestiary maxed you can see it urself on wiki.

 

[NotSarcastic]

Because they undo the nerf for some lower lvl metins and kept it only for higher ones, if you have the bestiary maxed you can see it urself on wiki.

Also, attack value way better than %avg at lower levels, especially low DPS duhh